跳到正文
原文
Frontiers in Psychiatry· Cheng Zhang·· 2 小时前AI 评分37

远程监督运动康复对卒中后抑郁、焦虑与生活质量:一项系统综述、证据图谱与探索性定量合成

Remote supervised exercise- and physical activity-based rehabilitation for post-stroke depression, anxiety, and quality of life: a systematic review, evidence map, and exploratory quantitative synthesis

AI 导读

一项纳入6项随机研究、483名参与者的系统综述显示,远程监督运动或身体活动康复对卒中后抑郁、焦虑和生活质量的证据仍不稳固。唯一可直接分析的抑郁效应来自Sun等的12周多学科远程康复项目(含在线心理咨询),Hedges g=0.93(95% CI 0.64–1.22),但GRADE证据确定性极低,排除该试验后无剩余可分析效应。

正文

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Psychiatry

Sec. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Rehabilitation

  • 1. College Of Physical Education And Health, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, China

  • 2. School of Physical Education, Sichuan Minzu College, Kangding, China

Abstract

Background: Depression, anxiety, and reduced quality of life are common after stroke and may interfere with rehabilitation engagement and long-term recovery. Remote supervision can support home-based exercise or physical activity, but the available programs are complex packages that may also include coaching, caregiver involvement, education, and psychological support. We aimed to synthesize randomized evidence on depression, anxiety, and quality of life after remotely supervised exercise- or physical activity-based stroke rehabilitation, accounting for comparator type and co-interventions. Methods: This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261394314) and reported according to PRISMA 2020. PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Scopus were searched from inception to 1 March 2026. Randomized studies of remotely supervised exercise- or physical activity-based rehabilitation after ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke were eligible if depression, anxiety, or quality-of-life outcomes were extractable. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2, certainty was evaluated using GRADE, and a co-intervention sensitivity analysis examined the evidence remaining after exclusion of interventions with explicit psychological support. Results: Six randomized studies involving 483 participants were included. Interventions, comparators, outcome instruments, and study designs were heterogeneous, precluding a primary pooled meta-analysis. The only directly analyzable depression effect against standard care came from Sun et al., a 12-week multidisciplinary telerehabilitation program that included online psychological counseling; the aligned Hedges g was 0.93 (95% CI 0.64 to 1.22), conventionally large, but certainty was very low. After this trial was excluded, no directly analyzable depression effect against standard care remained. Active-vs-active depression or distress findings did not establish superiority. Quality-of-life signals varied across instruments and comparators; no separable patient anxiety effect was available. Conclusion: The included evidence concerns complex remote rehabilitation packages rather than exercise alone. A possible depression benefit is supported principally by one trial with a psychological-support co-intervention and is therefore fragile. Remote programs should not be regarded as stand-alone treatments for post-stroke depression or anxiety. Confirmatory trials should recruit or stratify participants by baseline psychiatric symptoms, prespecify psychiatric outcomes, and separate exercise from psychological and implementation components.

Keywords

Anxiety, Exercise, physical activity, post-stroke depression, Quality of Life, Remote Supervision, Stroke, telerehabilitation

Received

22 May 2026

Accepted

30 September 2026

Copyright

© 2026 Zhang, Zhou, Cai and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence:

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

来源:Frontiers in Psychiatry · frontiersin.org

猜你喜欢