慢性应激诱导抑郁的神经进展:纵向 fMRI 研究
Neuroprogression of chronic stress-induced depression via longitudinal fMRI
一项纵向 fMRI 研究对慢性不可预测轻度应激(CUMS)小鼠(n=7)在基线、第5天和第10天进行追踪,发现抑郁进展呈层级式时空解体:fALFF 显示尾壳核、内侧前额叶和海马局部枢纽依次受损,图论分析显示节点局部效率和聚类广泛下降而全局节点效率暂时保留,动态分析则发现网络从灵活重构转向动态僵化。前额叶-嗅区连接异常与动态僵化被列为候选多尺度纵向影像特征,有待未来验证。
Abstract
Background:
Depression is increasingly viewed as a progressive neurobiological trajectory, yet the spatiotemporal transition from early mood dysregulation to chronic network failure, and its relation to disease-related functional decline, remains unclear. Using a chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS) mouse model, we aimed to map the longitudinal brain transformation from local spontaneous activity to global network dysfunction via multi-parametric MRI.
Methods:
Longitudinal functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was performed on a cohort of CUMS mice (n = 7) across three longitudinal time points: Day 0 (baseline), Day 5 CUMS, and Day 10 CUMS. We integrated four analytical approaches: fALFF, static functional connectivity, graph theory, and dFC/dALFF.
Results:
Depression progression followed a hierarchical spatiotemporal dissolution. fALFF revealed sequential breakdown of local hubs in caudoputamen, medial prefrontal cortex, and hippocampus, suggesting involvement of motor-motivational and executive deficits. sFC showed sensory-limbic uncoupling between caudoputamen and visual areas, and altered mPFC-AON connectivity and hippocampal prefrontal (HPF-PL) dysconnectivity, indicating limbic-olfactory loop disruption. Graph theory indicated preserved global node efficiency but widespread loss of node local efficiency and clustering. Dynamic analyses uncovered a shift from flexible network reconfiguration to dynamic rigidity.
Conclusion:
Longitudinal CUMS exposure was associated with progressive alterations in functional network organization. The prefrontal olfactory dysconnectivity and onset of dynamic rigidity represent candidate multi-scale and longitudinal imaging features that warrant future validation.
Highlights
Depression progression shows a staged pattern, moving from localized activity shifts to global network rigidity.
Chronic stress primarily erodes local clustering and nodal efficiency while temporarily sparing the global connectome backbone.
Progression toward severe depression is associated with reduced metastability, characterized by increased occupancy of a singular, low-connectivity functional state.
The transition from diverse dynamic repertoires to temporal rigidity provides a mechanistic framework for understanding the temporal progression of chronic mood disorders.
1 Introduction
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is no longer viewed as a transient, reversible chemical imbalance but as a progressive neurobiological trajectory, a staged process characterized by cumulative structural and functional insults to the cerebral architecture (, ). In the context of chronic stress-induced pathology, this progressive deterioration is particularly relevant, as it intersects with systemic inflammation, oxidative stress and vascular vulnerability (, ). By the time severe symptoms manifest, the brain’s functional connectome has already undergone a potentially irreversible reorganization ().
This suggests a silent period of neuroprogression where the brain remains behaviorally compensated despite underlying network decay (, ). For instance, theoretical models such as the disconnection syndrome suggest that progressive microstructural and neurovascular alterations can disrupt white matter tracts and metabolic pathways essential for emotional regulation (, ). Identifying the precise transition points, the tipping points, from a resilient state to a locked depressive state remains one of the most elusive goals in translational neuropsychiatry ().
To understand the temporal progression of a depressive state, we must look at the hierarchy of brain failure, beginning at the voxel level. Local spontaneous fluctuations, measured via fractional amplitude of low frequency fluctuations (fALFF), reflect the regional intensity of low-frequency blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) oscillations in specific hubs like the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and hippocampus (, ). In the early stages of depression, these regions often exhibit a paradoxical hyper-reactivity, a frantic attempt by neural tissue to maintain homeostatic output despite a declining synaptic density (). However, this initial increase in spontaneous local activity eventually gives way to a secondary decline, potentially reflecting underlying neurovascular or cellular exhaustion under chronic stress (, ).
As these local signals falter, the disruption radiates outward, severing the functional connectivity (FC) across long range neural circuits. This decoupling is most pronounced in the reward circuit (striatal prefrontal) and the default mode network (DMN), where the synchronicity between the nucleus accumbens and higher order cortical regions begins to erode (, ). In the context of chronic stress, this decoupling may be further exacerbated by cumulative insults to myelin integrity, which increases conduction noise and reduces the signal-to-noise ratio of functional communication (, ). This shift from local changes to circuit level desynchronization may represent a critical transition from subclinical stress to overt moderate depression ().
Beyond individual circuits, the global organization of the brain determines its overall resilience to pathological changes induced by stress. Using graph theory, we can treat the brain as a complex mathematical construct of nodes and edges (). A healthy brain maintains a delicate balance between local specialized processing (clustering) and global integration (short path lengths), allowing for rapid information transfer while minimizing the metabolic cost of long distance wiring (, ).
However, chronic stress progressively impairs these topological properties. As depression reaches a severe stage, the “Rich Club” hubs, the high-traffic areas like the precuneus and anterior cingulate, begin to lose their central influence (, ). This leads to a breakdown of the small-world topology, characterized by an increase in characteristic path length (). In this state, neural information must take a more circuitous and energy expensive route to travel across the brain, resulting in the cognitive slowing, executive dysfunction, and the psychomotor retardation that defines severe depressive states (). This topological decay may reflect a loss of structural reserve and warrants further investigation as a candidate marker ().
Perhaps the most critical, yet overlooked, aspect of the depressed brain is its dynamism. The healthy brain is not a static wiring diagram; it is a metastable system that fluidly transitions between various functional states to meet changing environmental demands (, ). These states represent transient patterns of co-activation that form and dissolve within seconds, a process governed by the brain’s entropic capacity ().
In the CUMS model, this fluidity gives way to dynamic rigidity. By employing dynamic FC (dFC) and dynamic fALFF (dALFF), we can capture the flickering of these brain states (, ). This approach allows us to quantify the occupancy and dwell time of specific states. We hypothesize that as depression progresses, the brain becomes trapped in maladaptive, low-connectivity patterns, a sustained state of low functional connectivity and reduced global network integration (, ). This temporal rigidity mirrors the behavioral despair and anhedonia observed in mice and may explain why chronic depression becomes increasingly resistant to pharmacological treatment: the brain has lost the flexibility required to reconfigure its networks into a healthy state (, ).
To bridge these gaps, we utilized a longitudinal CUMS mouse model to simulate the longitudinal impact of chronic stress across three distinct time points: Day 0 (baseline), Day 5 CUMS, and Day 10 CUMS. By integrating local activity (fALFF), static network topology (Graph Theory), and temporal dynamics (dFC/dALFF), this study provides a comprehensive characterization of disease progression across the course of the disorder. We hypothesize that depression follows a hierarchical breakdown: beginning with local metabolic shifts, progressing to circuit-level decoupling, and culminating in a loss of global topological efficiency and temporal flexibility (, , ). By tracking these changes in a controlled longitudinal design involving seven mice (n = 7) scanned repeatedly across three time points, we provide a robust set of candidate imaging features that align with the neuroprogression framework, offering a new window of opportunity for stage specific therapeutic intervention prior to the onset of a persistent reduction in temporal network flexibility (, ). The graphical abstract of the present study is demonstrated in Figure 1.
Figure 1
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Animals depression model protocol
Adult male C57BL/6J mice were housed under a 12 h light/dark cycle with ad libitum access to food and water. All procedures were approved by the Beijing Normal University and performed in accordance with the NIH guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. To simulate the progressive nature of depression, mice underwent our improved CUMS protocol (Table 1) (, ). We increased the stress intensity by applying electric shock, restraint, tail clipping, and day-night reversal on a random schedule to ensure unpredictability (). Specifically, each stressor was administered with the following parameters: restraint for 2 h; water deprivation for 6 h; food deprivation for 6 h; forced swimming for 10 min; tail clipping (pinching) for 10 min; cold exposure at 4 °C for 1 h; heat exposure at 45 °C for 10 min; day-night reversal for 12 h; cage tilting at 45°; and electric foot shocks (0.5 mA, 12 times within 10 min, delivered randomly). The order and combination of these stressors were pseudo-randomized across the 10-day protocol to avoid habituation. All mice were housed singly throughout the experiment to prevent social buffering effects, and the experimenters were blinded to group assignments during all behavioral and imaging procedures. Imaging was conducted at three distinct longitudinal milestones ().
Table 1
| Day | Morning | Afternoon | Night |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Imaging | ||
| 1 | Depriving Water Tilt | Clip Tail Restraint | Depriving Water & Food |
| 2 | Restraint Depriving Cushioning Materials | Low Temperature | Electric Shock Day-Night Reversal |
| 3 | High Temperature Depriving Food | Force Swimming Clip Tail | Tilt Restraint |
| 4 | Clip Tail Tilt | Restraint | Day-Night Reversal Electric Shock |
| 5 | Imaging | ||
| 6 | Depriving Water Tilt | Clip Tail Electric Shock | Restraint |
| 7 | Restraint Depriving Food | High Temperature Force Swimming | Depriving Cushioning Materials Tilt |
| 8 | Depriving Water | Low Temperature Electric Shock | Restraint Tilt |
| 9 | Clip Tail Depriving Water & Food | Restraint Force Swimming | Electric Shock Day-Night Reversal |
| 10 | Imaging | ||
The improved chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS) protocol.
“Imaging” in bold refers to fMRI imaging.
All animals were subjected to the CUMS protocol, with no separate non-stressed control group. Instead, Day 0 (baseline) served as the within-subject control for each animal. A total of 10 mice were initially enrolled at the beginning of the study. Across the three imaging sessions, three mice died due to their inability to tolerate the stress associated with the imaging procedure (one mouse died following each of the Day 0, Day 5, and Day 10 scanning sessions). To ensure a strictly balanced longitudinal design, data from these three deceased animals were completely removed from all longitudinal analyses. Thus, the final cohort of animals that completed all three time points was n = 7, and this same cohort (n = 7) contributed to all analyses at Day 0, Day 5, and Day 10.
The three experimental time points were defined relative to CUMS exposure: Day 0 served as the baseline, Day 5 CUMS represented the mid-point of the 10-day stress protocol, and Day 10 CUMS represented the completion of the 10-day stress protocol. This staging approach follows the established CUMS literature, where progressive behavioral and neurobiological deterioration is observed over the course of chronic stress exposure (, ).
2.2 Data acquisition
Anaesthesia was induced with 2% isoflurane delivered in a mixture of 0.4 L/min medical air and 0.1 L/min O2. The animal was then positioned on an animal bed, and anaesthesia was maintained at 2% isoflurane. To reduce motion during scanning, the head was immobilized using ear bars, a bite bar, and a nose cone. Once the probe was secured within the scanner, the isoflurane concentration was decreased to 1.5%, administered in 0.4 L/min medical air and 0.1 L/min O2. Core body temperature was continuously monitored with a rectal thermometer (). All physiological parameters remained within normal ranges during scanning (respiratory rate: 60–80 breaths/min; heart rate: 400–500 bpm). Structural and functional MRI images were acquired using Bruker BioSpec small animal MRI scanner system (9.4 T horizontal bore, 94/30 USR, Germany). Images were acquired using a T2-weighted TurboRARE sequence with the following parameters: repetition time (TR) = 2,000 milliseconds (ms), echo time (TE) = 15 ms, field of view (FoV) = 19.2 × 14.4 mm, matrix = 200 × 150, slice thickness = 0.4 mm, spacing between slices = 0.4 mm, flip angle = 90° and scanning time = 16 min (). Rapid acquisition with refocused echoes (RARE) sequence was used to acquire T1-weighted images with the following parameters: RT = 3,000 ms, ET = 28 ms, FoV = 19.2 × 14.4 mm, matrix = 200 × 150, slice thickness = 0.4 mm, spacing between slices = 0.4 mm, flip angle = 90° and scanning time = 3 min ().
2.3 Data preprocessing
Data preprocessing was performed using SPM12 (Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, London, UK) and the GRETNA toolkit (), supplemented by ANTs (Advanced Normalization Tools) () and ITK-SNAP for anatomical refinements (). Given the small size of the rodent brain, all anatomical and functional images were first scaled by a factor of 10 to facilitate the use of algorithms optimized for human imaging. To synchronize the temporal acquisition of different slices, slice-timing correction was applied using sinc interpolation, resampling each slice’s BOLD time series to the mid-acquisition time (). Functional images were then realigned using a 6-parameter rigid-body transformation to correct for head motion (). To ensure high data quality, stringent exclusion criteria were applied: any subject with cumulative head motion exceeding 3 mm in displacement or 3° in rotation was excluded from further analysis (). No additional subjects in the final longitudinal cohort (n = 7) were excluded during data preprocessing, as all remaining animals met the head motion thresholds. For each subject, the mean functional image was generated to serve as a reference for subsequent co-registration. To improve registration accuracy, manual brain extraction (skull stripping) was performed on both the mean functional and structural T2-weighted images using ITK-SNAP (). Additionally, the origin of each scan was manually reoriented to ensure spatial consistency with the standard mouse brain template origin. Spatial normalization was achieved through a multi-step procedure using ANTs (). First, the individual functional images were linearly co-registered to their corresponding structural images. Subsequently, the structural images were normalized to the standard mouse brain template space using both linear and non-linear (diffeomorphic) transformations. The resulting transformation matrices were then applied to the functional data, which were resampled to standard space. Finally, to improve the signal-to-noise ratio and reduce residual spatial noise, the normalized functional images were smoothed using a gaussian kernel of 4 × 4 × 4 mm3 (scaled space) full width at half maximum (FWHM) (). To further minimize the influence of non-neural artifacts, several denoising steps were implemented. Linear detrending was applied to remove signal drift caused by scanner heating or physiological fluctuations. Nuisance covariates were regressed out using a multiple linear regression model, which included: (1) the Friston-24 motion parameters to account for complex head motion effects (); (2) white matter (WM) signals; and (3) cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) signals (). Finally, the data underwent band-pass temporal filtering (0.01-0.08 Hz) to isolate the frequencies of physiological interest and suppress high-frequency respiratory/cardiac noise and low-frequency fluctuations ().
2.4 Neuroimaging metrics and connectivity analysis
To characterize the local spontaneous neural activity, the fALFF was calculated (, ). Consistent with standard fALFF protocols, the preprocessing for this metric excluded band-pass filtering to preserve the full frequency spectrum (). The fALFF maps were calculated by dividing the power within the low-frequency range (0.01-0.08 Hz) by the total power across the entire frequency range (). For group-level comparisons, these maps were standardized using m-transformation (dividing by the global mean) followed by z-score transformation. For voxel-wise FC, seed regions were defined based on the Allen Mouse Brain Common Coordinate Framework (CCFv3), including the cerebellum (). Pearson’s correlation coefficients were computed between the mean time series of each ROI and the time series of every voxel in the rest of the brain. Subsequently, fisher’s r-to-z transformation was applied to the resulting FC maps to improve the normality of the distribution for statistical inference ().
Functional brain networks were constructed using the allen brain atlas to define 391 anatomical regions of interest (ROIs) () (Supplementary File). To construct functional brain networks from the subject-level 391×391 Pearson correlation matrices, network topological properties were calculated using the graph theoretical network analysis toolkit (GRETNA v2.0.0). Specifically, to eliminate biologically ambiguous interpretations, negative correlation coefficients were set to zero, retaining positive-only edges. The resulting positive correlation matrices were transformed into binary unweighted graphs across a wide range of proportional network sparsity thresholds (S). Sparsity was defined as the ratio of existing edges to the total number of possible edges in the network. To ensure that network topology comparisons were independent of total edge count, a sparsity range of 0.05 ≤ S ≤ 0.40 with an incremental step of 0.01 was applied. For each sparsity threshold across this range, primary graph theoretical metrics were computed, including degree centrality (Dc), node efficiency (Ne), node clustering coefficient (NCc), and node local efficiency (NLe). For each metric, the area under the curve (AUC) across the sparsity continuum (S∈[0.05, 0.40]) was calculated to provide a single, threshold-independent scalar summarizing overall network topology. In cases of disconnected nodes resulting from sparse thresholding, nodes were retained in the graph structure, and path-length-based metric calculations (such as efficiency) were executed using standard GRETNA algorithms where the path length between disconnected pairs was assigned as infinity (1/∞ = 0), thus naturally accounting for network fragmentation without excluding isolated nodes (, ).
To characterize the temporal dynamics of brain activity and connectivity, a sliding window approach was implemented (, ).
Window characterization: For each subject, the preprocessed BOLD time series were segmented into 105 consecutive windows using a rectangular window profile with a window length of 30 TRs and a step size of 1 TR (). This configuration was chosen to achieve a balance between capturing stable functional states and maintaining sufficient temporal resolution to detect rapid transitions in brain dynamics ().
Metric calculation: dFC: Within each sliding window, a 391×391 functional connectivity matrix was constructed by calculating pairwise pearson’s correlation coefficients between the mean time courses of all ROIs. dALFF: Simultaneously, voxel-wise fALFF values were computed within each window to generate a sequence of dALFF maps, representing the spatial-temporal fluctuations of regional spontaneous activity over the 105 windows ().
Temporal state clustering: All windowed dFC matrices and dALFF maps from all subjects and time points were concatenated. To identify recurrent brain states, a K-means clustering algorithm was applied using the city-block (Manhattan) distance metric (). To determine the optimal number of clusters (K), we performed a heuristic search across a range of K = 2-5. To ensure the stability and reproducibility of the clustering results, the K-means algorithm was repeated 50 times with random initializations for each candidate K value. The optimal number of clusters was determined by the elbow criterion (within-cluster sum of squares) and confirmed by silhouette analysis. To resolve label-switching across iterations, cluster labels were aligned using the Hungarian algorithm before computing temporal properties. The resulting clusters were defined as quasi-stable brain states. Their temporal properties, including fractional time (the proportion of time spent in each state) and transition frequency (the number of times an individual switched between states), were extracted for further statistical comparison across time points ().
For the temporal properties of the identified dFC and dALFF states (fractional time and transition frequency), group differences across the three time points were assessed using repeated measures ANOVA. The significance threshold for each state-level comparison was adjusted to α/K, where K is the number of states (K = 5 in the present study).
2.5 Statistical analysis
All voxel-based statistical analyses were performed using SPM12 (Statistical Parametric Mapping, Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, London, UK) and the GRETNA toolkit (), running on MATLAB (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA). Data format conversion from DICOM to NIfTI was initially conducted via dcm2niix (). To identify longitudinal changes in neural activity, a one-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to the fALFF maps across the three time points. To ensure statistical rigor and minimize distribution assumptions, a non-parametric permutation test (5,000 permutations) was implemented within the GRETNA environment (). The resulting F-statistical maps were thresholded at a voxel-level of p < 0.001 and a cluster-level of p < 0.05 to correct for multiple comparisons (). Significant clusters were localized and visualized using xjview and MRIcroGL ().
For clusters exhibiting a significant main effect of time, the mean fALFF values were extracted from the identified ROIs. For node-level graph theoretical metrics, repeated measures ANOVA was applied to identify regions showing significant longitudinal changes. To strictly control for false positive rates across the 391 anatomical ROIs, multiple comparison correction was implemented using the false discovery rate (FDR) approach (Benjamini-Hochberg procedure) applied across ROI-level tests for each graph metric independently (q < 0.05). Results surviving FDR correction are reported as statistically significant, whereas regions reaching uncorrected threshold (P < 0.05) are explicitly treated as exploratory findings and interpreted with due caution. All uncorrected p-values are reported alongside effect sizes for transparency. These extracted values were then used for post-hoc pairwise comparisons via paired-sample t-tests. To account for the inflation of type I error in multiple comparisons, p-values for the post-hoc tests were adjusted using the Šidák correction. A Šidák-adjusted P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
For edge-wise comparisons of whole-brain functional connectivity, repeated measures ANOVA was applied to each of the 391×391 functional connections across the three time points. Given the large number of edges tested, we controlled for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) correction. Specifically, an FDR threshold of q < 0.05 was applied to the resulting P-values across all edges to maintain the expected proportion of false positives at or below 5%. Only edges surviving this FDR correction were reported as significantly altered.
3 Results
3.1 Spatiotemporal evolution of local spontaneous activity
To identify the early to late physiological markers of depression progression, we first characterized the longitudinal shifts in local intrinsic brain activity using fALFF. A voxel-wise one-way ANOVA revealed 16 distinct brain clusters (Table 2) that exhibited significant fALFF alterations across the three experimental stages (Figure 2). These clusters were not randomly distributed but rather converged upon three critical functional anatomical systems: Caudoputamen (CP), mPFC and hippocampal formation (HPF).
Table 2
| Cluster | Brain region | Coordinates | F value | Cluster size | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X | Y | Z | ||||
| 1 | CP-R: Caudoputamen | 1.325 | 0.15 | -0.25 | 6.1283 | 29 |
| 2 | SSs-L: Supplemental somatosensory area | -4.075 | -0.65 | 1.15 | 6.8438 | 21 |
| 3 | MOB-L: Main olfactory bulb | -1.475 | 4.55 | 0.55 | 4.7061 | 15 |
| 4 | LSr: Lateral septal nucleus, rostral (rostroventral) part | -0.275 | 0.95 | 0.75 | 6.8363 | 24 |
| 5 | COPY-R: Copula pyramidis | 1.125 | -7.25 | 1.55 | 6.2707 | 23 |
| 6 | CP-L: Caudoputamen | -1.675 | 0.55 | 1.55 | 6.0901 | 18 |
| 7 | MOB-R: Main olfactory bulb | 5.25 | 3.35 | 1.75 | 8.7831 | 43 |
| 8 | DG-L: Dentate gyrus | -1.275 | -1.65 | 2.75 | 8.2916 | 34 |
| 9 | ORB: Orbital area | -1.075 | 3.15 | 1.75 | 8.4576 | 26 |
| 10 | SIM-L: Simple lobule | -2.275 | -6.05 | 2.75 | 6.0895 | 16 |
| 11 | POST-R: Postsubiculum | 1.725 | -3.45 | 3.35 | 5.8107 | 36 |
| 12 | CA3-R: Field CA3 | 1.125 | -1.45 | 2.55 | 7.6058 | 23 |
| 13 | DG-L: Dentate gyrus | -1.875 | 2.85 | 2.75 | 4.3121 | 19 |
| 14 | CUL: Culmen | -0.275 | -5.85 | 3.35 | 9.652 | 23 |
| 15 | Ice-L: Inferior colliculus, external | -1.675 | -5.45 | 3.35 | 6.7535 | 24 |
| 16 | SCs-L: Superior colliculus, sensory related | 0.125 | -4.05 | 3.75 | 7.2244 | 56 |
Voxel level spatial localization of differential nuclei.
Figure 2
The striatal-motor interface (Caudoputamen): Significant fALFF variances were observed within the CP (F(2,12) = 6.13, p = 0.015, ηp2 = 0.505; Table 2, cluster 1, 6). Post-hoc comparisons revealed a significant decrease in fALFF from Day 0 to Day 10 [t(6) = 4.23, PŠidák= 0.016, d = 1.38]. This progressive reduction in spontaneous activity within the CP, a region vital for sensorimotor and reward integration (, ), suggests a progressive disruption in the motor-motivation interface as CUMS exposure progressed from Day 5 to Day 10.
Top-down executive hubs (mPFC): The mPFC showed significant longitudinal changes in fALFF across the three time points (F(2,12) = 8.46, p = 0.005, ηp2 = 0.585; Table 2, cluster 9). Post-hoc comparisons revealed a biphasic pattern: fALFF increased from Day 0 to Day 5 (t(6) = 2.98, PŠidák= 0.072, d = 0.96), followed by a significant decline from Day 5 to Day 10 [t(6) = -3.45, PŠidák= 0.04, d = 1.12]. This initial increase may reflect compensatory hyper-reactivity, whereas the subsequent decline may reflect a progressive impairment of top-down emotional regulation as CUMS exposure continued ().
The stress vulnerable circuit (HPF): Analysis of the HPF revealed robust longitudinal differences (CA3-R: F(2,12) = 7.61, P = 0.008, ηp2 = 0.559; DG-L: F(2,12) = 8.29; P= 0.006, ηp2 = 0.58; Table 2, clusters 8, 12, 13). Post-hoc comparisons showed significant decreases in fALFF from Day 5 to Day 10 in both CA3-R [t(6) = -3.89, PŠidák= 0.024, d = 1.24] and DG-L [t(6) = -4.12, PŠidák=0.018, d=1.31]. Given the hippocampus’s sensitivity to glucocorticoid-mediated neurotoxicity and its role in cognitive-emotional integration (, ), these progressive decreases may reflect neural alterations associated with chronic stress exposure, which are commonly linked to cognitive and affective dysfunctions in rodent stress models.
Collectively, these localized fALFF changes indicate that the progression of depressive pathology is characterized by a hierarchical breakdown of spontaneous activity, beginning in localized functional hubs and eventually potentially compromising broader network synchrony.
3.2 Hierarchical breakdown of network connectivity
To investigate how localized fALFF alterations scale up to disrupt large scale brain communication, we performed seed-based voxel-wise FC analysis, using the previously identified hub regions (CP, mPFC, and HPF) as regions of interest.
3.2.1 Striatal connectivity disruption
The CP seeded FC analysis revealed three distinct clusters exhibiting significant longitudinal remodeling across the depression trajectory (Table 3; Figures 3A–C).
Table 3
| Brain region | Coordinates | F value | Cluster size | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X | Y | Z | |||
| CP-R: Caudoputamen | 1.525 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 20.8163 | 893 |
| CP-L: Caudoputamen | -2.075 | 1.35 | -0.05 | 16.1364 | 890 |
| VISpm-R: posteromedial visual area | 1.325 | 4.15 | -3.05 | 27.6973 | 812 |
Seed-based functional connectivity mapping of the caudoputamen.
Figure 3
Intra-striatal desynchronization: We observed significant FC changes in the bilateral caudoputamen (CP-R and CP-L). This loss of bilateral synchronization within the striatum may represent an early breakdown of the motor-motivation interface. Sensory-limbic uncoupling: Intriguingly, the CP showed progressive connectivity shifts with the Right Posteriomedial Visual Area (VISpm-R) (Supplementary Figure S1A). This uncoupling suggests that as depression worsens, the integration between primary sensory inputs and the reward-processing striatum becomes increasingly fragmented, a potential substrate for the “sensory blunting” often observed in chronic mood disorders (, ).
3.2.2 Prefrontal olfactory and hippocampal prefrontal connectivity
The mPFC- and HPF-seeded analyses revealed connectivity changes involving the olfactory limbic interface and the hippocampal prefrontal pathway, respectively. Prefrontal AON circuitry: The mPFC seeded analysis identified a significant cluster in the AON (Table 4; Figure 3D; Supplementary Figure S1B). As the mPFC is a primary regulator of emotional top-down control (), the altered connectivity with the AON highlights a disruption in the prefrontal-olfactory axis, which is closely linked to emotional memory and social recognition.
Table 4
| Brain region | Coordinates | F value | Cluster size | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X | Y | Z | |||
| AON: Anterior olfactory nucleus | -0.675 | -0.05 | 2.55 | 24.6458 | 40 |
Seed-based functional connectivity mapping of the prefrontal cortex.
Hippocampal-prefrontal connectivity (HPF seed): The HPF-seeded analysis revealed two clusters showing significant longitudinal changes in functional connectivity, located in the left hippocampal field CA1 (CA1-L) and the prelimbic area (PL) (Table 5;Figures 3E, F; Supplementary Figure S1C). The CA1 cluster indicates altered intra-hippocampal coupling, whereas the PL cluster points to altered connectivity along the hippocampal–prefrontal pathway. This pathway supports the integration of contextual and emotional information and is known to be vulnerable to chronic stress (). Notably, the PL is a subdivision of the mPFC; the HPF-PL change therefore links the two hubs identified in the fALFF analysis. Together with the mPFC-AON finding, this suggests that CUMS exposure affects a broader prefrontal-hippocampal-olfactory network rather than isolated regions, consistent with reports of limbic and olfactory limbic dysfunction in clinical depression (, ).
Table 5
| Brain region | Coordinates | F value | Cluster size | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X | Y | Z | |||
| CA1-L: Field CA1 | 4.125 | 1.95 | -2.85 | 20.8163 | 62 |
| PL: Prelimbic area | 0.125 | 1.95 | 1.95 | 23.8485 | 115 |
Hippocampus seed-based functional connectivity mapping.
3.3 Topometric reconfiguration and topological decay of the global connectome
To evaluate the systemic impact of depression progression on the brain’s organizational principles, we transitioned from voxel-wise circuits to an ROI based graph theoretical framework.
3.3.1 Longitudinal shifts in ROI-wise functional edges
At the macroscopic level, the whole brain functional connectome exhibited significant remodeling. A total of 19 functional connections demonstrated distinct temporal trajectories as the depressive phenotype matured (Figures 4A, B; Supplementary Figure S2), suggesting that the progression of depression is not localized to a single circuit but represents a steady erosion of inter-regional synchrony across the entire connectome.
Figure 4
3.3.2 Hierarchical breakdown of nodal topology
The analysis of nodal topological metrics revealed a hierarchical pattern of impairment, where local segregation metrics were more sensitive to depression progression than global integration metrics. Only one region exhibited significant differences in Dc (Figure 4C; Supplementary Figure S3A) and Ne (Figure 4D; Supplementary Figure S3B). In contrast, the most pronounced alterations were observed in NLe and NCc. We identified 7 regions (VISpm-L, NTS, GRN, IRN-L/R, LRNm-R, PARN-R) with significant NLe changes [all F(2,12) > 6.50, p < 0.05] (Figure 4F; Supplementary Figures S3E–K) and two regions (GRN, VISpm-L) with significant NCc variances [F(2,12) = 7.21 and 6.89, respectively, p < 0.05] (Figure 4E; Supplementary Figures S3C, D). These findings indicate a progressive loss of cliquishness and local information processing capacity, suggesting that the brain’s modular resilience is severely compromised as the pathology moves from a moderate to a severe state. This topological pattern, characterized by localized reductions in NLe alongside a relatively preserved global network architecture, provides potential exploratory indicators for tracking stress-induced functional alterations.
3.4 Temporal dissolution and the emergence of dynamic rigidity
To capture the flickering nature of brain states and their erosion over time, we employed a sliding window approach combined with K-means clustering to quantify the temporal dynamics of local activity and global connectivity.
3.4.1 Chronological transitions of local dynamic activity
K-means clustering of dALFF maps identified five distinct, recurring temporal states (States 1-5), capturing the brain’s of spontaneous regional activity (Figure 5; Supplementary Figure S4). Quantitative evaluation of dynamic state parameters revealed significant longitudinal alterations in temporal state metrics across the CUMS trajectory. Repeated measures ANOVA demonstrated a significant main effect of time on the fractional occupancy and dwell time of high-activity states (e.g., State 1: F(2,12) = 11.45, PFDR = 0.003, ηp2 = 0.656), which exhibited a progressive reduction over stress exposure. Conversely, fractional occupancy in low-activity states increased significantly over time (F(2,12) = 14.82, PFDR = 0.002, ηp2 = 0.712), accompanied by a significant overall decline in state transition frequency (F(2,12) = 8.76, ηp2 = 0.594). These metrics indicate a restricted dynamic range of regional spontaneous fluctuations under chronic stress. Comprehensive quantitative details, including exact fractional occupancies, dwell times, transition matrices, post-hoc t-statistics, PFDR values, and effect sizes (Cohen’s d) across all states and time points, are provided in Supplementary File.
Figure 5
3.4.2 Loss of network metastability
The dFC analysis further revealed alterations in the temporal organization of functional connectivity states during CUMS exposure. Visualization of the state assignments across successive time windows showed heterogeneous dFC patterns on Day 0 and Day 5, with multiple states represented across individual mice and time windows (Figure 6A). By Day 10, the temporal state-assignment pattern became more uniform, with State 3 visually occurring across many of the sampled time windows. This pattern indicates a reorganization of the dynamic connectivity landscape during prolonged stress exposure; however, state occupancy and transition frequency were not quantitatively evaluated in the present analysis. The corresponding state-specific functional connectivity matrices showed distinct connectivity patterns among the three identified states (Figures 6B–D). State 1 exhibited relatively widespread positive ROI-ROI connectivity, State 2 showed an intermediate connectivity pattern, whereas State 3 was characterized by generally weaker pairwise functional connectivity. Together, these observations indicate that prolonged CUMS exposure was associated with changes in both the temporal organization and connectivity profiles of dFC states, with the later stage displaying a greater representation of a low-connectivity configuration. This pattern is consistent with previous reports of altered network dynamics under prolonged stress ().
Figure 6
4 Discussion
In this study, Day 0 baseline measurements served as a within subject control, allowing each animal to act as its own baseline across the longitudinal CUMS trajectory. While this design minimizes inter-individual variability and enhances statistical power for tracking dynamic trajectory shifts, it cannot fully disentangle CUMS-specific neurobiological stress effects from secondary longitudinal influences. These confounders potentially include repeated anesthesia, repeated MRI gradient/radiofrequency exposure, habituation to handling, single housing, repeated behavioral testing, and time-dependent aging processes. To minimize these influences, an identical anesthesia protocol (2% isoflurane for induction and 1.5% for maintenance) with continuous physiological monitoring and identical acquisition parameters was used at every session, no stressors were applied on imaging days (Table 1), and the entire protocol spanned only 10-day in adult animals, limiting potential age-related effects. Consequently, the observed functional network shifts should be interpreted as alterations associated with the overall longitudinal CUMS experimental trajectory rather than strictly isolated stress-specific effects. Future longitudinal studies incorporating a parallel, non-stressed control cohort scanned at identical time intervals will help isolate these specific components.
Our findings suggest that the 10 days of depression in mice is a quintessential example of allostatic overload, that is, cumulative wear and tear on the brain’s regulatory systems (72, 73). These findings are consistent with the concept of reduced metastability in complex systems. This low-connectivity state represents a transition from a dynamic, adaptive system to a highly constrained functional configuration, which theoretically parallels a low-entropy state in network dynamics (, ). In complex systems research, this loss of complexity is a hallmark of functional decline (74, 75). The transition from baseline state to a singular, dominant State 3 at the severe stage suggests a reduction in network flexibility, making it unable to generate the complex neural patterns required for resilient emotional regulation (, ).
The 16 clusters of altered fALFF include CP, mPFC, and HPF, suggesting region-specific alterations in spontaneous BOLD activity that may reflect underlying neurobiological changes (, 76–79). The observed fALFF trajectory demonstrates a stage-dependent change in spontaneous low frequency BOLD activity. Its metabolic, cellular, and neurovascular basis cannot be determined from the present study.
One of our most novel findings is the involvement of the AON and VISpm in voxel level FC analysis. The AON serves as a primary limbic sensory gatekeeper (81). Olfactory-limbic pathways are known to be particularly sensitive to network breakdown across various chronic psychiatric and neurodegenerative conditions (, 80). Our findings demonstrate that stress-induced depression directly engages these vulnerable sensory-limbic loops in adult mice, highlighting an important circuit node for future studies examining stress-related neuroprogression. The CP-VISpm decoupling suggests a failure in bottom-up sensory integration (82). As the brain becomes less responsive to external visual and olfactory cues, this may serve as a protective mechanism to reduce allostatic load. Ultimately, however, it isolates the brain, reinforcing depressive rumination and behavioral despair (, 83).
Our graph theory results reveal a constrained network architecture prioritizing localized metabolic efficiency over global dynamic integration. The brain must balance the metabolic cost of connections with the functional need for integration (, ). The stability of node efficiency and betweenness suggests that the mouse brain prioritizes the structural skeleton of the connectome (, 84). This may be an adaptive strategy whereby the brain cannot afford to lose its global communication pathways. However, the widespread decline in node local efficiency (NLe) across 7 brain regions indicates that functional modules are being compromised (, 85). The brain appears to prioritize the preservation of global integration at the expense of local specialized processing (86, 87). Our findings suggest that the hallmark of the functionally deteriorating brain may be a loss of modular complexity, rather than a total breakdown of communication (, 88). We speculate that this could relate to the concept of cognitive reserve. The transition to State 3 in our dFC analysis at day 10 may reflect a critical shift in network dynamics. Visualization of State 3 shows a global weakening of interactions, suggesting a marked reduction in network flexibility. In system dynamics, this is known as an extended relaxation time in network fluctuation patterns, which is conceptually analogous to critical slowing down phenomena observed prior to state transitions in complex systems (89, 90).
The network alterations observed in our longitudinal model provide a mechanistic framework for understanding chronic stress-induced neuroprogression. Because all metrics used here are derived from non-invasive, task-free resting-state fMRI, these features could, if validated, inform the development of imaging-based tools for the early detection and staging of depression in humans. Such validation will require independent rodent cohorts including sham-control animals, both sexes and behavioral phenotyping, as well as longitudinal human resting-state fMRI cohorts, such as first-episode, drug-naive patients and individuals at high risk for depression. While our study was conducted in adult mice, these multi-scale imaging features (e.g., AON dysconnectivity and dynamic network rigidity) may represent shared circuit vulnerabilities that could have broader translational relevance, including potential applications in studying mood disorders across different stages of adulthood. Future studies incorporating aged animal cohorts will be necessary to directly test how age-related baseline changes interact with stress-induced connectome deterioration.
Future research should integrate diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and post-mortem histology (e.g., GFAP, Iba1 and MBP staining for astrocytes, microglia and myelin, respectively) to assess whether the dynamic rigidity we observed is purely functional or is underpinned by cellular and white matter alterations (, 91).
5 Conclusion
Our study demonstrates that the progression of depression is a multi-scale unraveling of the brain’s functional architecture. It begins as a localized functional alteration, spreads as a circuit-level sensory-limbic disconnection, and terminates as a global topological and temporal rigidity. By identifying the prefrontal-olfactory dysconnectivity and state switching, we identify candidate imaging targets that move beyond simple connectivity measures and warrant future validation and toward a truly dynamic, staging-based approach to neuropsychiatric health.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
The animal study was approved by Beijing Normal University (Zhuhai Campus) (NO. AECBNUZ2025018). The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.
Author contributions
YY: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. HJ: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. HL: Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition, Validation, Investigation, Resources, Supervision, Project administration, Methodology.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under grant No. 32371079. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.
Acknowledgments
We thank BioRender.com for providing the platform to create the process flow diagram.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1898694/full#supplementary-material
Supplementary Figure 1
Visualized seed point location: CP (A), mPFC (B) and hippocampal formation (C).
Supplementary Figure 2 The 19 functional connections in the whole brain functional connectivity (A–S). AUDp, posterior part of the primary auditory cortex; ILA, infralimbic area; PERI, perirhinal cortex; CA2, hippocampal field CA2; VISal, visual cortex, anterolateral area; CEAc, central amygdalar nucleus, lateral capsular part; VISpm, visual cortex, posteromedial area; BST, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis; AIv, agranular insular cortex, ventral part; PoT, posterior thalamic nuclear group; VMH, ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus; PeF, perifornical nucleus; ECT, ectorhinal cortex; TU, olfactory tubercle; PF, parafascicular nucleus; Ice, inferior colliculus, external nucleus; GPi, globus pallidus, internal segment; P5, layer 5 of the pons; PT, parategmental nucleus of the thalamus; RPO, rostral pontine reticular nucleus; LP, lateral posterior thalamic nucleus; DCO, dorsal cochlear nucleus; MGm, medial geniculate nucleus, medial part; Eth, ethmoid nucleus; VCO, ventral cochlear nucleus; AOB, accessory olfactory bulb; PARN, parvicellular reticular nucleus; GRN, gigantocellular reticular nucleus; PGRNd, paragigantocellular reticular nucleus, dorsal part; TR, trigeminal spinal tract nucleus, rostral part; SIM, simple lobule; COPY, copula pyramidis; SPIV, spinal trigeminal nucleus, interpolar part; ENT, entorhinal cortex; FL, flocculus; Each nucleus is subdivided into left (L) and right (R) subregions; Seven mice (n = 7) were scanned repeatedly across time points; Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Differences across time points (Day 0, Day 5, Day 10) were assessed by repeated measures ANOVA with Šidák correction for multiple comparisons; Adjusted p-values: ****P ≤ 0.0001, ***p ≤ 0.001, **p ≤ 0.01, *p ≤ 0.05. The significant differences in graph theory node attributes among different brain regions: Degree centrality (A), node efficiency (B), node clustering coefficient (C, D) and node local efficiency (E–K); Seven mice (n = 7) were scanned repeatedly across time points; Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Differences across time points (Day 0, Day 5, Day 10) were assessed by repeated measures ANOVA with Šidák correction for multiple comparisons; Adjusted p-values: ****p ≤ 0.0001, ***p ≤ 0.001, **p ≤ 0.01, *p ≤ 0.05. dALFF clustering of different brain states, state 2 (A) and state 4 (B); Red indicates higher ALFF values (more active brain regions), and blue indicates lower dALFF values (less active brain regions).
References
1
MoylanSMaesMWrayNRBerkM. The neuroprogressive nature of major depressive disorder: pathways to disease evolution and resistance, and therapeutic implications. Mol Psychiatry. (2013) 18:595–606. doi: 10.1038/mp.2012.33
2
BerkMWilliamsLJJackaFNO'NeilAPascoJAMoylanSet al. So depression is an inflammatory disease, but where does the inflammation come from? BMC Med. (2013) 11:200. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-200
3
AlexopoulosGS. Depression in the elderly. Lancet. (2005) 365:1961–70. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66665-2
4
KuoC-YLinC-HLaneH-Y. Molecular basis of late-life depression. Int J Mol Sci. (2021) 22:7421. doi: 10.3390/ijms22147421
5
KrishnanKRRGaddeKM. The pathophysiologic basis for late-life depression-imaging studies of the aging brain. Am J Geriatric Psychiatry. (1996) 4:S22–33.
6
DumanRSAghajanianGK. Synaptic dysfunction in depression: potential therapeutic targets. Science. (2012) 338:68–72. doi: 10.1126/science.1222939
7
AlexopoulosGSMeyersBSYoungRCCampbellSSilbersweigDCharlsonM. ‘Vascular depression’ hypothesis. Arch Gen Psychiatry. (1997) 54:915–22. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1997.01830220033006
8
SneedJRCulang-ReinliebME. The vascular depression hypothesis: an update. Am J Geriatric Psychiatry. (2011) 19:99–103. doi: 10.1097/jgp.0b013e318202fc8a
9
NelsonBMcGorryPDWichersMWigmanJTWHartmannJA. Moving from static to dynamic models of the onset of mental disorder a review. JAMA Psychiatry. (2017) 74:528–34. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0001
10
ZangY-FHeYZhuC-ZCaoQ-JSuiM-QLiangMet al. Altered baseline brain activity in children with ADHD revealed by resting-state functional MRI. Brain Dev. (2007) 29:83–91. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2006.07.002
11
ZouQ-HZhuC-ZYangYZuoX-NLongX-YCaoQ-Jet al. An improved approach to detection of amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF) for resting-state fMRI: Fractional ALFF. J Neurosci Methods. (2008) 172:137–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.04.012
12
MaybergHS. Targeted electrode-based modulation of neural circuits for depression. J Clin Invest. (2009) 119:717–25. doi: 10.1172/jci38454
13
SapolskyRM. Glucocorticoids and hippocampal atrophy in neuropsychiatric disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry. (2000) 57:925–35. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.57.10.925
14
BansalYKuhadA. Mitochondrial dysfunction in depression. Curr Neuropharmacol. (2016) 14:610–8. doi: 10.2174/1570159x14666160229114755
15
RussoSJNestlerEJ. The brain reward circuitry in mood disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci. (2013) 14:609–25. doi: 10.1038/nrn3381
16
KaiserRHAndrews-HannaJRWagerTDPizzagalliDA. Large-scale network dysfunction in major depressive disorder a meta-analysis of resting-state functional connectivity. JAMA Psychiatry. (2015) 72:603–11. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.0071
17
BartzokisG. Age-related myelin breakdown: a developmental model of cognitive decline and Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. (2004) 25:5–18. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2003.03.001
18
FieldsRD. White matter in learning, cognition and psychiatric disorders. Trends Neurosci. (2008) 31:361–70. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2008.04.001
19
DrysdaleATGrosenickLDownarJDunlopKMansouriFMengYet al. Resting-state connectivity biomarkers define neurophysiological subtypes of depression. Nat Med. (2017) 23:28–38. doi: 10.1038/nm0217-264d
20
BullmoreETSpornsO. Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat Rev Neurosci. (2009) 10:186–98. doi: 10.1038/nrn2575
21
BassettDSBullmoreET. Small-world brain networks. Neuroscientist. (2006) 12:512–23. doi: 10.1177/1073858406293182
22
AchardSBullmoreET. Efficiency and cost of economical brain functional networks. PloS Comp Biol. (2007) 3:174–83. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030017
23
van den HeuvelMPSpornsO. Rich-club organization of the human connectome. J Neurosci. (2011) 31:15775–86. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.3539-11.2011
24
van den HeuvelMPSpornsO. An anatomical substrate for integration among functional networks in human cortex. J Neurosci. (2013) 33:14489–500. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.2128-13.2013
25
ZhangJWangJWuQKuangWHuangXHeYet al. Disrupted brain connectivity networks in drug-naive, first-episode major depressive disorder. Biol Psychiatry. (2011) 70:334–42. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.05.018
26
AlexopoulosGS. Frontostriatal and limbic dysfunction in late-life depression. Am J Geriatric Psychiatry. (2002) 10:687–95. doi: 10.1097/00019442-200211000-00007
27
SternY. Cognitive reserve. Neuropsychologia. (2009) 47:2015–28. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195328875.003.0006
28
KelsoJAS. Multistability and metastability: understanding dynamic coordination in the brain. Philos Trans R Soc B-Biological Sci. (2012) 367:906–18. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0351
29
DecoGJirsaVKMcIntoshAR. Emerging concepts for the dynamical organization of resting-state activity in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. (2011) 12:43–56. doi: 10.1038/nrn2961
30
Carhart-HarrisRLLeechRHellyerPJShanahanMFeildingATagliazucchiEet al. The entropic brain: a theory of conscious states informed by neuroimaging research with psychedelic drugs. Front Hum Neurosci. (2014) 8:20. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00020
31
HutchisonRMWomelsdorfTAllenEABandettiniPACalhounVDCorbettaMet al. Dynamic functional connectivity: Promise, issues, and interpretations. NeuroImage. (2013) 80:360–78. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.079
32
PretiMGBoltonTAWVan De VilleD. The dynamic functional connectome: State-of-the-art and perspectives. NeuroImage. (2017) 160:41–54. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.061
33
KaiserRHWhitfield-GabrieliSDillonDGGoerFBeltzerMMinkelJet al. Dynamic resting-state functional connectivity in major depression. Neuropsychopharmacology. (2016) 41:1822–30. doi: 10.1038/npp.2015.352
34
DecoGKringelbachML. Great expectations: using whole-brain computational connectomics for understanding neuropsychiatric disorders. Neuron. (2014) 84:892–905. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.08.034
35
WillnerP. Validity, reliability and utility of the chronic mild stress model of depression: a 10-year review and evaluation. Psychopharmacology. (1997) 134:319–29. doi: 10.1007/s002130050456
36
DumanRSAghajanianGKSanacoraGKrystaJH. Synaptic plasticity and depression: new insights from stress and rapid-acting antidepressants. Nat Med. (2016) 22:238–49. doi: 10.1038/nm.4050
37
MenonV. Large-scale brain networks and psychopathology: a unifying triple network model. Trends Cognit Sci. (2011) 15:483–506. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.08.003
38
InselTRCuthbertBN. Brain disorders? Precisely. Science. (2015) 348:499–500. doi: 10.1126/science.aab2358
39
WilliamsLM. Precision psychiatry: a neural circuit taxonomy for depression and anxiety. Lancet Psychiatry. (2016) 3:472–80. doi: 10.1016/s2215-0366(15)00579-9
40
WillnerP. Chronic mild stress (CMS) revisited: Consistency and behavioural-neurobiological concordance in the effects of CMS. Neuropsychobiology. (2005) 52:90–110. doi: 10.1159/000087097
41
LiXTengTYanWFanLLiuXClarkeGet al. AKT and MAPK signaling pathways in hippocampus reveals the pathogenesis of depression in four stress-induced models. Transl Psychiatry. (2023) 13:200. doi: 10.1038/s41398-023-02486-3
42
KilkennyCBrowneWJCuthillICEmersonMAltmanDG. Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PloS Biol. (2010) 8:6. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000412
43
HennigJNauerthAFriedburgH. Rare imaging-a fast imaging method for clinical MR. Magn Reson Med. (1986) 3:823–33. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910030602
44
NorrisDG. High field human imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. (2003) 18:519–29. doi: 10.1002/jmri.10390
45
WangJWangXXiaMLiaoXEvansAHeY. GRETNA: a graph theoretical network analysis toolbox for imaging connectomics. Front Hum Neurosci. (2015) 9. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00386
46
AvantsBBTustisonNJSongGCookPAKleinAGeeJC. A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration. NeuroImage. (2011) 54:2033–44. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.025
47
YushkevichPAPivenJHazlettHCSmithRGHoSGeeJCet al. User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: Significantly improved efficiency and reliability. NeuroImage. (2006) 31:1116–28. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.015
48
SladkyRFristonKJTroestlJCunningtonRMoserEWindischbergerC. Slice-timing effects and their correction in functional MRI. NeuroImage. (2011) 58:588–94. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.078
49
FristonKJWilliamsSHowardRFrackowiakRSJTurnerR. Movement-related effects in fMRI time-series. Magn Reson Med. (1996) 35:346–55. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910350312
50
PowerJDBarnesKASnyderAZSchlaggarBLPetersenSE. Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion. NeuroImage. (2012) 59:2142–54. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.018
51
FristonKJ. Commentary and opinion.2. statistical parametric mapping-ontology and current issues. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. (1995) 15:361–70. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.1995.45
52
FoxMDSnyderAZVincentJLCorbettaMVan EssenDCRaichleME. The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. PNAS. (2005) 102:9673–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504136102
53
BiswalBYetkinFZHaughtonVMHydeJS. Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magn Reson Med. (1995) 34:537–51. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910340409
54
WangQDingS-LLiYRoyallJFengDLesnarPet al. The allen mouse brain common coordinate framework: A 3D reference atlas. Cell. (2020) 181:936–53. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.007
55
FisherRA. Frequency distribution of the values of the correlation coefficient in samples from an indefinitely large population. Biometrika. (1914) 10:507–21.
56
LeonardiNVan De VilleD. On spurious and real fluctuations of dynamic functional connectivity during rest. NeuroImage. (2015) 104:430–6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.09.007
57
AllenEADamarajuEPlisSMErhardtEBEicheleTCalhounVD. Tracking whole-brain connectivity dynamics in the resting state. Cereb Cortex. (2014) 24:663–76. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs352
58
CalhounVDMillerRPearlsonGAdaliT. The Chronnectome: time-varying connectivity networks as the next frontier in fMRI data discovery. Neuron. (2014) 84:262–74. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.015
59
LiXMorganPSAshburnerJSmithJRordenC. The first step for neuroimaging data analysis: DICOM to NIfTI conversion. J Neurosci Methods. (2016) 264:47–56. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.03.001
60
NicholsTEHolmesAP. Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples. Hum Brain Mapp. (2002) 15:1–25. doi: 10.1002/hbm.1058
61
FristonKJWorsleyKJFrackowiakRSMazziottaJCEvansAC. Assessing the significance of focal activations using their spatial extent. Hum Brain Mapp. (1994) 1:210–20. doi: 10.1002/hbm.460010306
62
RordenCBrettM. Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. Behav Neurol. (2000) 12:191–200. doi: 10.1155/2000/421719
63
BalleineBWO'DohertyJP. Human and rodent homologies in action control: corticostriatal determinants of goal-directed and habitual action. Neuropsychopharmacology. (2010) 35:48–69. doi: 10.1038/npp.2009.131
64
VoornPVanderschurenLGroenewegenHJRobbinsTWPennartzCMA. Putting a spin on the dorsal-ventral divide of the striatum. Trends Neurosci. (2004) 27:468–74. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2004.06.006
65
HiserJKoenigsM. The multifaceted role of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex in emotion, decision making, social cognition, and psychopathology. Biol Psychiatry. (2018) 83:638–47. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.10.030
66
McEwenBSGianarosPJ. Stress- and allostasis-induced brain plasticity. Annu Rev Med. (2011) 62:431–45. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-052209-100430
67
McCabeCMishorZCowenPJHarmerCJ. Diminished neural processing of aversive and rewarding stimuli during selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment. Biol Psychiatry. (2010) 67:439–45. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.11.001
68
TreadwayMTZaldDH. Reconsidering anhedonia in depression: Lessons from translational neuroscience. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. (2011) 35:537–55. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.06.006
69
DotyRL. Olfactory dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases: is there a common pathological substrate? Lancet Neurol. (2017) 16:478–89. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(17)30123-0
70
AttemsJLintnerFJellingerKA. Olfactory involvement in aging and Alzheimer’s disease: An autopsy study. J Alzheimers Dis. (2005) 7:149–57. doi: 10.3233/jad-2005-7208
71
DecoGKringelbachMLArnatkeviciuteAOldhamSSabaroedinKRogaschNCet al. Dynamical consequences of regional heterogeneity in the brain’s transcriptional landscape. Sci Adv. (2021) 7:eabf4752. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abf4752
72
McEwenBS. Stress, adaptation, and disease - allostasis and allostatic load. Neuroimmunomodulation: Molecular Aspects, Integrative Systems, and Clinical Advances. Ann N Y Acad Sci. (1998) 840:33–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb09546.x
73
McEwenBSWingfieldJC. The concept of allostasis in biology and biomedicine. Horm Behav. (2003) 43:2–15. doi: 10.1016/s0018-506x(02)00024-7
74
LipsitzLAGoldbergerAL. Loss of complexity and aging-potential applications of fractals and chaos theory to senescence. Jama-Journal Am Med Assoc. (1992) 267:1806–9. doi: 10.1001/jama.267.13.1806
75
GoldbergerALAmaralLANHausdorffJMIvanovPCPengCKStanleyHE. Fractal dynamics in physiology: Alterations with disease and aging. PNAS. (2002) 99:2466–72. doi: 10.1073/pnas.012579499
76
IadecolaC. The neurovascular unit coming of age: a journey through neurovascular coupling in health and disease. Neuron. (2017) 96:17–42. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.07.030
77
RaichleMEMintunMA. Brain work and brain imaging. Annu Rev Neurosci. (2006) 29:449–76. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112819
78
LogothetisNK. What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI. Nature. (2008) 453:869–78. doi: 10.1038/nature06976
79
FranceschiCCampisiJ. Chronic Inflammation (Inflammaging) and its potential contribution to age-associated diseases. Journals Gerontology Ser a-Biological Sci Med Sci. (2014) 69:S4–9. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glu057
80
BraakHBraakE. Neuropathological staging of alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathol. (1991) 82:239–59. doi: 10.1007/bf00308809
81
WessonDWWilsonDA. Sniffing out the contributions of the olfactory tubercle to the sense of smell: Hedonics, sensory integration, and more? Neurosci Biobehav Rev. (2011) 35:655–68. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.08.004
82
HaberSNKnutsonB. The reward circuit: linking primate anatomy and human imaging. Neuropsychopharmacology. (2010) 35:4–26. doi: 10.1038/npp.2009.129
83
Nolen-HoeksemaSWiscoBELyubomirskyS. Rethinking rumination. Perspect psychol Sci. (2008) 3:400–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00088.x
84
van den HeuvelMPSpornsO. Network hubs in the human brain. Trends Cognit Sci. (2013) 17:683–96. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.012
85
RubinovMSpornsO. Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations. NeuroImage. (2010) 52:1059–69. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003
86
BullmoreETSpornsO. The economy of brain network organization. Nat Rev Neurosci. (2012) 13:336–49. doi: 10.1038/nrn3214
87
FornitoAZaleskyABreakspearM. The connectomics of brain disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci. (2015) 16:159–72. doi: 10.1038/nrn3901
88
SternY. Cognitive reserve in ageing and Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet Neurol. (2012) 11:1006–12. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(12)70191-6
89
SchefferMBascompteJBrockWABrovkinVCarpenterSRDakosVet al. Early-warning signals for critical transitions. Nature. (2009) 461:53–9. doi: 10.1038/nature08227
90
SchefferMCarpenterSRLentonTMBascompteJBrockWDakosVet al. Anticipating critical transitions. Science. (2012) 338:344–8. doi: 10.1126/science.1225244
91
BeaulieuC. The basis of anisotropic water diffusion in the nervous system-a technical review. NMR BioMed. (2002) 15:435–55. doi: 10.1002/nbm.782
Keywords
chronic stress, depression, fMRI, neural network, neuronscience
Citation
Yang Y, Jia H and Liu H (2026) Neuroprogression of chronic stress-induced depression via longitudinal fMRI. Front. Psychiatry 17:1898694. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1898694
Received
03 June 2026
Revised
30 September 2026
Accepted
30 September 2026
Published
14 October 2026
Volume
17 - 2026
Reviewed by
Deanna Chea, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, United States
Lujain Sahab, King’s College London, United Kingdom
Updates
Copyright
© 2026 Yang, Jia and Liu.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: He Liu, heliu@bnu.edu.cn
†These authors have contributed equally to this work
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
来源:Frontiers in Psychiatry · frontiersin.org
猜你喜欢
- Frontiers in Psychiatry:南非与乌克兰青少年持续创伤应激共病的网络分析Frontiers in Psychiatry · 1 天前
- Frontiers in Psychology研究:AI伴侣拟人化感知与问题性情感依赖的关联Frontiers in Psychology · 1 天前
- Frontiers in Psychiatry 网络元分析:传统中式健身功法对大学生心理与体质的比较效果Frontiers in Psychiatry · 5 天前
- Frontiers in Psychiatry研究:PHQ-9不适合作为基层首诊心理健康筛查工具Frontiers in Psychiatry · 8 天前
- Frontiers in Psychology 发表癌症观察等待患者体验的质性系统综述与主题综合Frontiers in Psychology · 9 天前